Global Warming Debate Finally Resolved. We need to put an end to the nonsense. It has been the basis for the collapse of the global economies by banning exploration of natural resources !! - natural resource reserves that are being found at a rate faster than we can utilize them. Literally! 

Evidence is continually mounting that disproves the claims that CO2 is causing global temperature changes. i.e. global warming or climate change is a bunch of unsubstantiated claims that are proved to be false. With every cycle of nature, nature has its own way with dealing with the condition. CO2 is one part of the cycle, and it is naturally dealt with, whether it is naturally or anthropologicly produced. ALL claims from the polar bears, to the melting of Greenland's glaciers to stop the Thermohaline (ocean current conveyor) can, and have been proved with documented empirical evidence, and not by the suppositions and speculations that are the basis for almost all global warming claims. From the so called hockeystick temperature chart that is three separate charts, on three separate scales, arbitrarily placed side by side to show a dramatic increase of temperatures, to the positive feedback form CO2 which turns out to be actually a negative feedback effect through 20 years of satellite data recordings, to the loss of the worlds glaciers, which one had been hiding from the satellites the size of California, (how can you hide a glacier from a satellite?? - you cant, someone was manipulating the statistics) which was found in June 2009, and on and on, is proof there is no such condition as global warming, which was changed to climate change to cover any inevitability to the melting of Larson B ice shelf which was caused by seafloor vulcanic activity, can all be verified through empirical evidence, not as the claims the climate change beleivers are claiming. The claim was even argued that global warming will cause global cooling... yeah right... and I have ocean front property in Kansas.

Global Warming AKA Climate Change Is Not A Scientific Condition, only the ideological manifestation and opinions of a few! The IPCC has realized the basis for global warming/climate change is based on flawed scientific research and has quietly discontinued using critical data which was the foundation to present CO2 as a basis for global warming/climate change.

CO2 is what plant life breaths (green plant life that relies on photosynthesis to include most food crops), and at 200 PPM levels of atmosphere CO2, all plants that require CO2 for photosynthesis have growth stunted. At 180 PPM levels of atmospheric CO2, photosynthesis begins to diminish and the plant begins to die. And at 150 PPM levels of atmospheric CO2, no photosynthesis is possible, and all plant life that relies on photosynthesis which includes all green plants and most food crops, dies, ceases to exist and no possibilities of new sprouts to grow!!!

 Only in the last 600 thousand years of the 4.5 Billion year history of Earth, has CO2 levels been so low, accounting for only 0.33% of the last 600 million years. CO2 levels of the last 600 thousand years has been at low enough levels to be on the verge of all photosynthesis to shut down completely, potentially causing mass extinction, again, and only in the last few hundred years is it high enough to increase crop yields !!!

CO2 does not, cannot, has not, nor will not influence temperatures to be of any significance. This is documented empirical peer reviewed evidence widely accepted by a large cross section of the variety of science fields and disciplines.

A scientific consensus misnomer is based on "a wide sample" of ten percent of articles, published in only one source. That is equivalent to going into the woods, and basing 100% knowledge based on only studying one species of animals, with opinions inserted as empirical evidence. Literally.

Supporting information is as follows - You decide for yourself without simply repeating what others are repeating......

The chart is presented for the first time to the public in  2008:

This Chart shows temperature and CO2 levels for 600 million years. True, CO2 levels have not been as high as current levels for 2 million years, but that is only 0.33% of the 600 million year timeline. The other 99.67% of the time, CO2 has been 2 to 18 times the current levels, and there is no correlation in temperature and CO2 levels. It is extremely unlikely, the physics of 598 million years has developed a new set of parameters for the past 2 million years. This chart has been forwarded to leading scientists and researchers around the world for peer review, and anyone who can prove this chart incorrect, contact the science community to show the science community how their findings are wrong.

Note that the CO2 level on the far right of the chart is barely on the scale.

The reason is, that CO2 does not influence the temperatures much, about 0.036% of the value, but the contrary, that temperatures precede CO2 level raise 600 to 2000+ (six hundred to two thousand) years. The chart below posted by NASA, had proved that the hottest ten years on record (I say 'on record' with tong in cheek because records have only been documented for about two hundred years), had been in the last fifteen years or so. But there was what has been classified as a "computer error" by NASA, for the chart to show that the hottest temperatures have been in recent years. Fortunately someone fixed the error, and it now shows that in the 1930's and 1940's were hotter than current temperatures......

There has also been a glacier found that must have been hiding behind a tree, or hillside, about the size of the state of California in mid May of 2009. Where did the glacier come from if the temperatures are in a runaway heat spike??? maybe someone accidentally didn't include it in the documentation over the past ten years or so, or maybe.... well, use your imagination. This wouldn't be the first time someone tried to rig or manipulate the facts to prove their own agenda. The fact is that the temperatures are actually decreasing. Literally.

This chart shows the relationship between CO2 and temperatures over the past 400,000 years. At a glance it looks like CO2 causes temperatures to spike, but if the temperature and CO2 chart is overlaid.....

this is what you would see.... Regions between the black bars show CO2 and temperatures are not congruent.

A comprehensive critique of the movie hosted by a politician trying to warn us of our lifestyle that is polluting the planet, and will cause untold devastation, can be read for yourself. CLICK HERE

Temperatures are red, CO2 is blue, and why is it that during tens of thousands of years CO2 levels climb, while temperatures fall????? The actual answer is that CO2 levels rise 600 to 2000+ years AFTER temperatures rise. Also notice the far right edge of the chart. If expanded, the chart would...

Look like this..... Temperatures dropping, not rising......

This shows for that past 20,000 years, temperatures have been slightly dropping. This IS the chart that is widely accepted by the scientific community. The so called "hockeystick" chart is actually three charts of three different scales, accidentally stuck together without rescaling all to the same scale, by Mr. Michael Mann. (CLICK FOR DOCUMENT) I too had to do a double take of charts to compare statistics while researching for a documentary production, to actually address whether global warming were a true event, or if it is a man made situation for political purposes. I researched with the premise that I have no opinion one way or another, simply analyze the facts of actual research and recorded data and physics. Even the charts with orientation from left to right or right to left aren't quite standard.... Why is it that the past four thousand years that CO2 is climbing, while temperatures are dropping if there is real global warming.... I mean climate change.. A good generic term to prove any inevitability that the climate decides to do. Temperature goes up and the can say "I told you so." If the temperatures drop they can say, "I told you so." The first time I heard someone try to play that game, "I laughed so hard I fell off my dinosaur!!"

Hurricane Katrina is used as a posterchild for Climate Change/Global Warming. The problem with this myth is that the Gulf Of Mexico experiences Warm Core Rings which are swirling Eddy's that break off the Gulf Stream. A number of them occour yearly, and ocasionally two occour at the same time. Generally warm water is only at the surface, and storms churn the cold water from below, but Warm Core Rings have warm water as deep as 100 feet or more. Being hundreds of miles across, they can stoke a storm to higher levels. What happened when Katrina crossed the Gulf is that there were two Warm Core Rings, causing Katrina to escalate to high levels, which were predicted and warned about. Katrina has nothing to do with global climate changes or global temperature rise.

Yes there are conditions and situations that mankind can cause that has adverse effect on the environment, and could lead to catastrophic consequences, but CO2 is not one of them. It comes down to ecological guilt - to have emotional responses toward the environment, for political and monetary gains by those who promote "Climate Change". It is as simple as that. The problem is that unless there is a major technological advancement, solar electric, and wind generation costs multiple times more than conventional coal or nuclear steam electric generators. I have been a novice electrical engineer for motor control and power distribution, and since 1975, have not yet found a solar electric system that has comparable generation at the rate of being connected to the grid, which is about $.05554 per KWH. If it were economical, I would have had solar electric, wind generation, and geothermal heat pump systems since the early 1980's. I would have had an electric powered vehicle since 1980 when we had the gasoline shortage, but it has been impractical, until recently, and even then, there are marginal gains at best to use alternative energy systems. The major problem is that alternative energy sources are not reliable, and the grid is still required for night time or no wind operation. This means that a second system is always needed, that is many times less costly than alternative energy systems, and why have two systems?, one or more of them costing many times more than being connected to the grid. It comes down to bragging rights, and why should we be forced to pay many times more for alternative systems, because someone else wants to have bragging rights??????

If we continue on the same political path we are currently engaged, the economies will only stagnate, and there will be food shortages, not because of the devastation of global warming, but by the hyper inflated economies caused by mandated systems that are twice as expensive and more, than current energy systems.

Do the math. Using a pedal cycle to generate electricity to power a coffee pot, or other appliances, is actually more damaging to the environment than plugging into the grid. Take into consideration the calories needed, the wattage output, the food needed to generate the calories, and the carbon footprint to get the food to the person using a manual pedal cycle to save the planet, and see if you don't get a carbon footprint many times larger than plugging into the grid...... but they don't like to let you know these facts, do they?? or that if after six or eight years of motions to block the building permits to install a new wind generator, that there are more petitions to block the installation of electric lines to get the wind generated electric from the wind farms to the cities and populated areas, delaying the projects for another two to six years. Or that wind generation need thousands of gallons of water to keep the blades clean of insect. A thin layer of insects will drop the wind mill efficiency as much as twenty percent. If water is so scarce, why waste thousands of gallons per wind mill to keep the blades clean?? And one more point of issue, the blades only turn a few revolutions per minute, which is only about seven to ten miles per hour (about sixteen KPH) for a 100 foot long blade, so bird strikes are not an issue. Vehicles moving sixty to eighty MPH are not an issue for bird strikes, a wind mill is not either.

Within the eleven dimensional time space continuum in which I exist, the only thing that counts is documented empirical evidence, not creative manipulation of circumstances (many of which cannot be categorically presented as actual facts though true believers claim they are actual unconditional facts without any awkward facts clouding the issue) to prove a political point, which is all that the climate change opinion is.

CO2 is actually plant food, not a pollutant that needs to be regulated. Currently, cap and trade legislation is being constructed, and it will only cost more to exist. Contact your legislators and let them know you are tired of being falsely taxed, and to vote down the cap and trade legislation. If not, we get what we deserve by having elected politicians that only look out for their own agenda, while professing to be doing so for the good of the nation. Yeah, right....

Having been in conversation with leading scientists in their fields from all over the planet, most disagreeing, nearly a 99% consensus, with the climate change theories, the issue is now closed except by true believers and politicians. There is no climate change or global warming. It is only circumstantial and anecdotal evidence with some misdirection, bad science, errors, and opinions that proves global warming or climate change.

There IS more of a consensus to the fact that climate change and global warming is a myth, than the number of scientists that claim global warming or climate change is n actual event. Check the list of scientists at The Petition Project , more than 31,478 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with Ph D's. (this does not include the hundreds if not thousands of scientists from other countries) Not quite the claim that there is a consensus that all scientists believe global warming is real, now is it???

 The evidence is in, no more discussion is needed. And for those who want to use the age old tactic, and claim those who deny global warming also deny the holocaust, well, I am not going to comment. There IS documented evidence, as well as first hand reports from those who were imprisoned and those who liberated the camps, personally knowing those who were prisoners, and having family members that were the first to enter the camps to liberate the prisoners. Using a real event to promote a myth is quite frankly, used by persons who can only be categorized as the lowest common denominator of human life forms, though they can talk a good story to cover their inadequacies, or their arrogant opinions for what ever reason (too many to list).

Pop Quiz - What is the difference between renewable energies and NASCAR?? To Make a million dollars in NASCAR, you have to spend three million. To save a million dollars with renewable energies, you have to spend three million !

This is not the first time total "BS" was presented as facts or scientific proof. Leading doctors and scientists warned of those who would travel at high speeds, causing the brain to become disoriented, causing memory loss, delusions, and could cause permanent damage to the brain. Also was the strong possibility that the air would be sucked out of your lungs and cause unconsciousness and death. People would play word games, memorization games, cross word puzzles, and other cognitive tasks, to monitor if they were becoming permanently stupid, or that they were loosing consciousness. This was presented in the mid 1800's for trains traveling faster than 35 MPH.

The electric chair was developed by Thomas Edison to prove the lethal dangers of Alternating Current electricity. Small animals were first electrocuted, then larger animals, and even elephants. Since this was not a deterrent for deterring society from being fearful of the dangerous alternating current electricity, Mr. Edison developed the electric chair and gave it to the state of New York to execute prisoners.

The steel tycoon Andrew Carnegie, claimed his competitors "did not have homogeneous steel", but he (Carnegie) did."  With that phrase, Carnegie sold thousands of tone of steel, and his competitors had difficulty selling theirs. Apparently no one checked to understand what homogeneous meant - composed of parts or elements. It is not possible to have an alloy without having a "combining of", now can you.

The Current Economic Collapse Trigger

Excessively High Fuel Prices Drained The Economy, Which Caused A Domino Effect To Cause Home Foreclosure Rate To Spike!!

Even though the mortgage sector had a few malfunctions, the global economic mess is actually attributed to the skyrocketing cost of crude oil and gasoline. If new permits to explore for new petroleum reserves were issued, the economy would have not collapsed. And now the economies of all countries are in a bind, and the politicians are throwing trillions at the problem. It is comparable to having all four tires on your vehicle go flat, and putting a larger engine in the car to compensate. Then adding a larger transmission, more doors, heavier suspension, then as a last resort after thousands were needlessly spent, considering changing the tires. Shouldn't changing the tires be the first to do, and then cleaning all the sharp metal and screws off the road which caused the flat tires?????

Will the planet run out of oil soon?? Not likely. The stats are grossly underestimated when presenting reserve amounts. The front bars show what is advertized for the oil reserves (Extremely conservative for the stockholder presentation. The pastel bars behind the advertised reserves, are realistic reserve amounts. Note that the unconvential reserve is Trillions of barrels, not billions as the other bars represent.

If you have positive input (I don't have time or need for nasty remarks) contact me at:

E-Mail

There has been a number of comments made recently in the media that are quotes from this site. The only thing I ask is, "if you state phrases and segments of the text from this site, just state that you got the phrase from this site." All content in this site is copyright and subject to US and International Copyright laws.

Big Cat Rescue And Preservation

For a $20.00 donation, you will receive the 8.5 X 11 inch lithograph with serial number and a certificate of authenticity to fund big cat preservation and rescue. Many of these magnificent cats are endangered or slowly becoming close to becoming endangered. Donations are needed now in this difficult economy. Many big cats are needlessly killed each year for use in Asian Traditional medicine, which have some to no scientific evidence they work. Poaching has increased in the past year because of the global economy. For A t-shirt with this image on it, Click Here

7-8-08 JCP WFP

Copyright 2008 - All rights reserved